In Part 1 we looked at several financial objectives that should clearly be addressed prior to accelerating the payoff of your home mortgage. Once you have a handle on these priorities, should paying off the mortgage come next? Not so fast! Some legitimate reasons for not aggressively tackling the mortgage are outlined in Part 2. Although a persuasive argument for overall wealth creation can be made for maintaining a mortgage and investing that equity elsewhere, not everyone is convinced.
At Table Rock Financial Planning we understand that your personal finances are not just about math, nor is maximizing your portfolio by age 60 your sole objective. You are managing your finances not only for wealth creation, but also to minimize your family's risks. You undoubtedly place a significant value on financial security and your family's peace-of-mind.
Advantages to paying off your mortgage
Maybe these reasons don't motivate you to pay off the mortgage earlier-than-later. Maybe you aren't one of us who gets a big emotional boost from completing such a huge objective. Ask your spouse, however. Usually, at least one of you would sleep much better at night knowing that the house was paid for. Have some serious discussions on how paying off the mortgage fits into your overall financial plan. And then, if it is right for you, get after it with a passion. Check it off the list and be done--it will feel great!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*The only time this is not going to be the case is if you have an extremely low interest fixed-rate mortgage, and current interest rates have spiked up considerably higher. I'm not sure when the last time the stars were aligned like this, but I assume it was over 25 years ago.
If you have ever shared your intent to pay off your home mortgage with coworkers, invariably one of them will passionately let you know just what a stupid idea it is. It doesn't matter if you are a fireman or doctor, an engineer or accountant, this topic will continue to be debated at the water cooler--or wherever coworkers gather these days. At Table Rock Financial Planning we believe that paying off your mortgage prior to retirement is generally a wise move, and makes sense both financially and emotionally. However, as outlined in Part 1, there are a number of financial objectives that should be prioritized over accelerating your mortgage payoff. And, as evidenced by the controversy surrounding the topic, the decisions around paying off a mortgage aren't cut-and-dried. Again, this is personal finance, and the strategy that is right for you may not be optimal for your neighbor.
Reasons to go slow on paying down your mortgage
These are some pretty persuasive arguments for going slow on paying down your mortgage. Of course, some people take "slow" to the extreme, and never get around to actually owning their own home. Maybe that is a reasonable strategy that works for them. However, most Americans consider paying off their home a critical part of their financial plan. In Part 3, we'll examine a number of good reasons to pay off your mortgage.
In the meantime, those inclined toward scholarly economic papers might enjoy this research brief, Should You Carry a Mortgage into Retirement, from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. The author's bottom line is that it's a good idea for most people to pay off your mortgage prior to retirement. Here is the conclusion:
The above analysis indicates that retired households are, in theory, better off repaying their mortgage. In addition to this theoretical conclusion, there is also a very practical argument against borrowing to invest. If a household with a mortgage mismanages its investments, or over-estimates the rate at which it can decumulate those investments, it risks losing the house, its only remaining asset.
One argument that is sometimes cited in favor of not repaying the mortgage is that retaining a mortgage increases the household's liquidity, and enables it to better cope with sudden unexpected expenses. But households that retain a mortgage need to consider what they would do if the bad event actually happened - i.e., how they would maintain their mortgage payments once their financial assets had been spent.
Where should paying off your mortgage fit in your financial priorities? This is a question that should be on any mortgage holder's mind as they sort through the myriad of competing financial objectives. Like a number of personal financial topics, this is one where reasonable people may come to different conclusions. And this should be no surprise, after all this is personal finance--where math and economic theory often take a backseat to emotions, behavior, and relationships.
For starters, let me state my general opinion on the topic. Yes, you want to get your mortgage paid off--certainly by retirement, hopefully sooner. Paying off your mortgage has significant advantages in lowering the overall financial risk in your life and managing your post-retirement cash flow. For most people, but maybe not everyone, there are also exceptional emotional benefits to being totally out of debt. However, before you rush to make that extra payment, realize that a number of other financial priorities should take precedence over paying off or down the mortgage on your home. Don't let a good thing become a bad thing by doing it at the wrong time.
Things to do before paying off your mortgage
You've established a foundation of spending less than you earn, and now it is time to start putting those "excess" funds toward your top objectives. Some of the objectives that should clearly come before accelerating the payoff of your mortgage are:
Don't take this somewhat long list of priorities as a reason to give up on paying off your mortgage. At Table Rock Financial Planning we believe having an objective to pay off the mortgage, sooner-than-later, should be part of most everyone's retirement plan. In Parts 2 and 3 other thoughts and issues regarding the decision to pay off your mortgage will be considered. In the meantime, here are two other takes on the subject from Ron Lieber (New York Times) and Liz Pulliam Weston (MSN).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*There are situations where it would make sense to pay off a mortgage before student loans, but these are certainly not the norm. It depends on your loan (student and home) balances and terms (interest rates, payments, length of term, etc), your tax situation, and your potential fit for a federal student loan forgiveness program.
**Paying down (or off) your mortgage does increase your home equity which is theoretically available in a financial pinch. However, it is usually somewhat time consuming and expensive to access this home equity in an emergency. Some financial advisors suggest establishing a home equity line of credit (HELOC) up front, before you need it in an emergency. Personally, I prefer having a sizeable emergency fund that I control, as opposed to counting on the access to credit via a HELOC.
The “Bad Bank” episode of This American Life referenced in the recent post “The Economy Explained” featured an interesting conversation with Columbia Business School professor, David Beim. Besides talking about a bank run in ancient Rome (AD 37) and why not loaning out the government bailout money is the right course of action for the less healthy banks to take, Beim showed a striking chart measuring the level of American household debt. Now showing a chart on the radio is generally not effective, but his description of the trends sure caught my attention. (Click here for a shorter version of the story.)
The latter part of this chart, which shows the ratio of household debt to GDP in the US from 1916 to the present, is not surprising. As Beim describes it, “From 2000 to 2008, it just goes, almost a hockey stick, it goes dramatically upward…It hits 100% of GDP.” This sounds bad, but you have to see the rest of the chart to gain the proper perspective. The ratio moves slowly from around 30% of GDP in the late 1930’s to about 50% of GDP in the mid 1980’s. In the latter part of the 1980’s it accelerates above 50% and goes though 70% by year 2000. Then the real hockey stick move to 100% in 2007.
This may be a bit scary, but hardly a shock if you’ve been paying attention the last twenty five years. What is truly sobering, however, is the second peak of the graph off to the left. As it turns out, this ratio of household debt to GDP reached 100% earlier in our history. The year was 1929—the year of the great stock market crash and start of the Great Depression.
Beim goes on to explain, “That chart is the most striking piece of evidence that I have that what is happening to us is something that goes way beyond toxic assets in banks, it’s something that had little to do with mortgage securitization, or ethics on Wall Street, or anything else. It says the problem is us. The problem is not the banks, greedy though they may be, overpaid though they may be. The problem is us. We have over-borrowed. We have been living very high on the hog. We are, our standard of living has been rising dramatically over the last 25 years, and we have been borrowing to make much of that prosperity happen.”
Now I’m not going make too much out of this one piece of data. Even without this amazing coincidence between 1929 and 2007, it just feels right that there would be eventual consequences to the rampant borrowing we used to finance an ever-improving standard of living. Although I won’t try and predict how the rest of the current economic turmoil plays out, I remain optimistic that we will work through this.
The sad thing is this data is the combination of millions of individual families who have borrowed too much and have lived with too little financial margin. Certainly some are victims of difficult circumstances, but others made poor choices and have lived beyond their means. Although as individuals we cannot control the economy as a whole, we do have control over the spending decisions in our homes. I am hopeful that the trials American families go through today will result in a fresh look at our priorities and produce wiser decisions in the future.
Jeff Opdyke previously wrote a weekly column called “Love and Money” in the Wall Street Journal and on Wednesday he provided some sound advice regarding money and marriage in “With this Debt, I Thee Wed”. (I’m sure its appearance on April 1 was not an intentional comment on the seriousness of the topic). The article was adapted from his recent book “Financially Ever After: The Couples Guide to Managing Money.” I haven’t seen or read the book, but in the article he had some good advice for couples, beyond pointing out the obvious fact that finances and the stress of debt can take a heavy toll on marital bliss.
I think everyone agrees that communication on finances is critical for couples. Jeff gives some very practical things to talk about—specifically what your philosophy is regarding debt and regarding savings? Of course, the two are intertwined. These are really just part of an overall “financial mission statement” or a set of agreed upon values for the couple to discuss. (Now this is starting to sound like too much work! Let’s go to the movies, instead.)
His example of this foundational statement was: “We agree to live below our means, not to pursue material wants without the money to afford them, never to use emergency savings for consumer purchases and to take on debt only when it benefits the family’s long-term goals or needs.” (Sounds pretty good to me.) Of course, more detail on how this affects your behavior, is critical.
A discussion of how you will use debt is pretty standard advice for couples. For example, discuss and agree on:
An equally important discussion regarding the use of savings is more easily missed. However, it is important to get agreement (which may involve a bit of compromise) up-front regarding:
This isn’t rocket science, but apparently many people go into marriage without this kind of discussion and understanding. Fortunately, pre-marital counseling (e.g. through your church) often helps couples work through these discussions. If not, a couple should be encouraged to read a finance book for couples, or consider talking to a financial planner who enjoys working with those starting out in life.
Next page: Disclosures