Categories: Debt
      Date: May 26, 2011
     Title: Paying Off Your Mortgage (Part 2) – Reasons to Go Slow

If you have ever shared your intent to pay off your home mortgage with coworkers, invariably one of them will passionately let you know just what a stupid idea it is. It doesn't matter if you are a fireman or doctor, an engineer or accountant, this topic will continue to be debated at the water cooler--or wherever coworkers gather these days. At Table Rock Financial Planning we believe that paying off your mortgage prior to retirement is generally a wise move, and makes sense both financially and emotionally. However, as outlined in Part 1, there are a number of financial objectives that should be prioritized over accelerating your mortgage payoff. And, as evidenced by the controversy surrounding the topic, the decisions around paying off a mortgage aren't cut-and-dried. Again, this is personal finance, and the strategy that is right for you may not be optimal for your neighbor.

Reasons to go slow on paying down your mortgage

These are some pretty persuasive arguments for going slow on paying down your mortgage. Of course, some people take "slow" to the extreme, and never get around to actually owning their own home. Maybe that is a reasonable strategy that works for them. However, most Americans consider paying off their home a critical part of their financial plan. In Part 3, we'll examine a number of good reasons to pay off your mortgage.

In the meantime, those inclined toward scholarly economic papers might enjoy this research brief, Should You Carry a Mortgage into Retirement, from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. The author's bottom line is that it's a good idea for most people to pay off your mortgage prior to retirement. Here is the conclusion:

The above analysis indicates that retired households are, in theory, better off repaying their mortgage. In addition to this theoretical conclusion, there is also a very practical argument against borrowing to invest. If a household with a mortgage mismanages its investments, or over-estimates the rate at which it can decumulate those investments, it risks losing the house, its only remaining asset.

One argument that is sometimes cited in favor of not repaying the mortgage is that retaining a mort­gage increases the household's liquidity, and enables it to better cope with sudden unexpected expenses. But households that retain a mortgage need to con­sider what they would do if the bad event actually hap­pened - i.e., how they would maintain their mortgage payments once their financial assets had been spent.